Main Menu
Welcome
journal ranking
| Why is the Impact Factor still around? |
| Much has been written about the Impact Factor, a bibliographic measure originally developed in the 1960s by Eugene Garfield as a tool to rank scholarly journals according to their mean citation rate and now published eve...[more] |
| impact factor citation statistics citation metrics journal ranking bibliometrics |
| Posted on Friday 20 February 2009 - 15:38:36 |
| Thomson Scientific (ISI) flunks scientific test. Twice. |
| I just came across an article in the Journal of Cell Biology (of all places) which could be the first solid nail in the coffin of that dreaded, vile impact factor. What is the impact factor? For the uninitiated, the impac...[more] |
| Thomson Scientific impact factor citation statistics citation metrics journal ranking |
| Posted on Thursday 20 December 2007 - 10:21:58 |
| Yet more trouble for the impact factor |
| After January's double whammie for Thomson Scientific and its coveted impact factor (here and here), my favorite journal, PLoS ONE has now published a paper which spells even more trouble for the company. The authors co...[more] |
| Thomson Scientific impact factor citation statistics citation metrics journal ranking |
| Posted on Wednesday 05 March 2008 - 20:38:33 |
| BIF: bibliographic impact factor or brain irritability factor? |
| The journal "Epidemiology" has a series of great articles on why we need to get rid of Thomson Scientific's Impact Factor. I've reported about this ridiculously influencial number before and how irrational, stupid and de...[more] |
| Thomson Scientific impact factor citation statistics citation metrics journal ranking |
| Posted on Friday 09 May 2008 - 10:30:34 |
| Thomson Scientific fights back |
| In the wake of the hard-hitting article by Rockefeller University Press editors in the Journal of Cell Biology (JCB), in which they describe how Thomson's ubiquitous impact factor twice flunked a scientific test, ...[more] |
| Thomson Scientific impact factor citation statistics citation metrics ScImage journal ranking butler |
| Posted on Thursday 03 January 2008 - 18:34:56 |
| Why Thomson's Bibliographic Impact Factor (BIF) is dead |
| Despite the recent downpour of evidence against the use of Thomson's BIF, I still get comments from people such as "However, IFs are still the most used way of evaluating a researcher's career and value. Even if we find ...[more] |
| Thomson Scientific impact factor citation statistics bibliometrics citation metrics journal ranking |
| Posted on Wednesday 23 July 2008 - 15:08:54 |
| Australian research council phases out impact factors |
| The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) is Australia's premiere funding agency for medical research and is no longer using Thomson Reuter's Impact Factors to evaluate individual grant applications or res...[more] |
| Thomson Reuters impact factor bibliometrics citation statistics citation metrics journal ranking |
| Posted on Tuesday 06 April 2010 - 12:48:11 |