Don't trust scientists! |
The plural of anecdote is not data. Yet, anecdotes of scientific misconduct are accumulating. Everyone knows the most high-profile cases like those of Jan Hendrik Schön or Hwang Woo-Suk. In a recent survey, over 70% of s...[more] |
tenure credibility politics fraud misconduct labor working hours |
Posted on Tuesday 02 March 2010 - 11:21:05 |
Science, red in tooth and claw |
I've been contemplating the current competitive state of science here before. The gist of it was that science may be suffering from too much competition, leading to an increasing incidence of misconduct, such as falsifyi...[more] |
open access sabotage tenure credibility politics fraud misconduct stress |
Posted on Thursday 30 September 2010 - 17:10:18 |
Increased publication pressure leading to increasing retractions? |
|
retractions incentives pressure impact factor misconduct fraud |
Posted on Tuesday 16 August 2011 - 16:51:03 |
Retractions correlate better with 'Impact Factor' than citations |
Thomson Reuters' Impact Factor (IF) is supposed to provide a measure for how often the average publication in a scientific journal is cited and thus a quantitative basis for ranking journals. However, there are (at least...[more] |
citations impact factor retractions bibliometrics misconduct fraud |
Posted on Thursday 18 August 2011 - 09:59:22 |