Main Menu
Welcome
citation metrics
| Impact factor receives yet another blow |
| 2008 is only about half way over and it's already been a devastating year for monopolist Thomson Scientific, formerly Institute for Scientific Information, ISI. First, the company's ...[more] |
| bibliometrics science publishing citations citation metrics impact factor citation statistics |
| Posted on Thursday 26 June 2008 - 11:02:00 |
| Post-publication paper assessment |
| There has been an interesting discussion going on at the message board for editors of PLoS One. I've posted a comment to this discussion I thought may be interesting to others as well. Here it is (slightly edited): I may ...[more] |
| bibliometrics science publishing citations citation metrics impact factor citation statistics |
| Posted on Monday 21 July 2008 - 17:55:28 |
| Australian research council phases out impact factors |
| The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) is Australia's premiere funding agency for medical research and is no longer using Thomson Reuter's Impact Factors to evaluate individual grant applications or res...[more] |
| Thomson Reuters impact factor bibliometrics citation statistics citation metrics journal ranking |
| Posted on Tuesday 06 April 2010 - 12:48:11 |
| Why Thomson's Bibliographic Impact Factor (BIF) is dead |
| Despite the recent downpour of evidence against the use of Thomson's BIF, I still get comments from people such as "However, IFs are still the most used way of evaluating a researcher's career and value. Even if we find ...[more] |
| Thomson Scientific impact factor citation statistics bibliometrics citation metrics journal ranking |
| Posted on Wednesday 23 July 2008 - 15:08:54 |
Go to page <<