linking back to brembs.net






My lab:
lab.png
Welcome Guest
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
 Currently Online (10)
 Extra Information
MicroBlog
You must be logged in to post comments on this site - please either log in or if you are not registered click here to signup

[23 Dec 12: 13:20]
Inbox zero! I don't even remember the last time I could say that!

[06 Aug 12: 14:21]
Phew! Done with nine 20min oral exams, three more to go. To be continued tomorrow...

[14 Oct 11: 11:45]
Just received an email from a computer science student - with an AOL email address?

[03 Jul 11: 22:26]
Google citation alerts suck: I just found out by accident I rolled over h-index of 13 and 500 citations http://blogarchive.brembs.net/citations.php

[21 May 11: 18:14]
6.15pm: Does god have Alzheimer? No #rapture in Europe...

[01 May 11: 11:31]
w00t! Just been invited to present at OKCon 2011! #OKCon2011


Networking

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed
Follow brembs on Twitter

Research papers by Björn Brembs
View Bjoern Brembs

Science Blog Directory
Random Video
SciSites
After catching my last few waves this morning, I'm now sitting at the computer evaluating the last weeks of research in the isolated leech nervous system. The main focus of the project was to do some pilot experiments towards establishing operant learning. I had done a quick-and-dirty evaluation last week already, but something didn't quite seem to fit, especially after taking the final week's worth of data and after eliminating all the preparations that didn't respond well to either anterior or posterior stimulation.

I ended up with a total of 13 preparations in three main groups: one experimental and two control groups. The two control groups consisted of one control group that did not receive any anterior stimulation at all, but was only observed for the 30 trials of posterior stimulation. The other control group was 'yoked' to preparations from the experimental group, i.e., they received anterior stimulations whenever the preparation in the experimental group received it, but irrpective of the motor pattern the animal actually was performing.

Each preparation then received ten posterior stimulations in a pre-test phase with no anterior stimulations. In the next phase, the training phase, all three groups received another ten posterior stimulations, but their anterior stimulations differed. In the experimental group, each preparation received contingent anterior stimulation on whatever was the most frequent motor pattern (swimming or crawling). The two control groups received either no anterior stimulation od yoked stimulations (see above). In the final test phase, all groups received the same ten posterior stimulations, without any anterior stimulation. This practice of making the anterior stimulation contingent on one of the two patterns during training means that each of the three groups can be further subdivided into two sub-groups: those who initially generated more swims and those who did the opposite.In theory, this means I have thus six groups. However, I didn't get any no-stimulatio controls whic responded with more crawls than swims in the pre-test, so I have a total of 5 groups.

You can follow my evaluations of the data below the fold:




[ Read the rest ... ]
Posted on Friday 24 September 2010 - 22:19:31 comment: 1
leech   operant   nervous system   neuroscience   learning   decision-making   


You must be logged in to make comments on this site - please log in, or if you are not registered click here to signup
Render time: 0.7129 sec, 0.0347 of that for queries.