linking back to brembs.net






My lab:
lab.png
Welcome Guest
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
 Currently Online (36)
 Extra Information
MicroBlog
You must be logged in to post comments on this site - please either log in or if you are not registered click here to signup

[23 Dec 12: 13:20]
Inbox zero! I don't even remember the last time I could say that!

[06 Aug 12: 14:21]
Phew! Done with nine 20min oral exams, three more to go. To be continued tomorrow...

[14 Oct 11: 11:45]
Just received an email from a computer science student - with an AOL email address?

[03 Jul 11: 22:26]
Google citation alerts suck: I just found out by accident I rolled over h-index of 13 and 500 citations http://blogarchive.brembs.net/citations.php

[21 May 11: 18:14]
6.15pm: Does god have Alzheimer? No #rapture in Europe...

[01 May 11: 11:31]
w00t! Just been invited to present at OKCon 2011! #OKCon2011


Networking

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed
Follow brembs on Twitter

Research papers by Björn Brembs
View Bjoern Brembs

Science Blog Directory
Random Video
SciSites

Here at the Royce Conference of University of Alberta, Marcia Spetch talked about her research on risky choice. She started out by stating that people tend to be risk-averse for gains and risk-prone for losses. She observes the behavior of pigeons to study how brains compute risk and chose risky or less risky options. As humans, pigeons are risk-averse on gain trials and risk-prone on gain trials. However, if pigeons and humans are allowed to experience several trials, these odds change and they become risk-prone for gains and risk-averse for losses over the course of the trials. She hypothesized that this might come from memory being better for extreme events such as the big wins, while losses are not seen as so extreme.

To test this hypothesis, she tested humans on a word task where the participants had to chose one of two words and then received a random reward for their choice. It turned out that the participants remembered the words best that had the least and the largest rewards. Another experiment included introducing less extreme rewards/losses in a standard choice assay. She found that the odds of being risk-averse or -prone didn't change in these trials whereas it did change for the extreme trials.
Posted on Friday 02 March 2012 - 19:01:24 comment: 0
spetch   risky choice   decision-making   Royce   


You must be logged in to make comments on this site - please log in, or if you are not registered click here to signup
Render time: 0.6603 sec, 0.0219 of that for queries.