linking back to brembs.net






My lab:
lab.png
Welcome Guest
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
 Currently Online (8)
 Extra Information
MicroBlog
You must be logged in to post comments on this site - please either log in or if you are not registered click here to signup

[23 Dec 12: 13:20]
Inbox zero! I don't even remember the last time I could say that!

[06 Aug 12: 14:21]
Phew! Done with nine 20min oral exams, three more to go. To be continued tomorrow...

[14 Oct 11: 11:45]
Just received an email from a computer science student - with an AOL email address?

[03 Jul 11: 22:26]
Google citation alerts suck: I just found out by accident I rolled over h-index of 13 and 500 citations http://blogarchive.brembs.net/citations.php

[21 May 11: 18:14]
6.15pm: Does god have Alzheimer? No #rapture in Europe...

[01 May 11: 11:31]
w00t! Just been invited to present at OKCon 2011! #OKCon2011


Networking

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed
Follow brembs on Twitter

Research papers by Björn Brembs
View Bjoern Brembs

Science Blog Directory
Random Video
SciSites

I've written a few times already about why I think (university) libraries are in a perfect position to take over scholarly communication from corporate publishers. Among other things I've mentioned that they already publish many of our theses, ancient texts and host journal article repositories (although it is of course clear that at the moment "repositories are failures – most have at best a few per cent of their output and academics either ignore them or regard them as a distraction or impediment. No-one uses them to discover scientific information because they are disorganised, have no useful search tools, and do not interoperate" this is easily fixable). Any such transition could be easily funded by the billions saved anually if subscriptions were cut. Given current publisher profit margins, the projected annual savings, once the transition is complete, would be about 4 billion (EUR/USD) every year - that's not exactly pocket change.

In two comments on the recent posts, both David Crotty and Neil Stewert pointed out that, in addition to the expertise I've already listed, (some) libraries already have all the tools, knowledge and training for proper academic publishing. The two examples the commenters mentioned (I'm now sure there are many more) were SAS Open Journals and Highwire Press. Thus, all it takes to transition from a system in which we outsource publishing to commercial publishers and lose approx. 40% of the money we pay to their shareholders to one where we get to keep these 40% to innovate and develop a modern scholarly communication system, is to cut subscriptions to free funds for disseminating  the know-how and the technology, as well as for extending the available infrastructure to make the different libraries interoperable according to a global standard (of course by hiring a bunch of smart experts, preferably from corporate publishers).

The more I learn, the more realistic it sounds to me that I actually might live to see a scholarly communication system that's not totally FUBAR.
Posted on Friday 22 June 2012 - 14:52:31 comment: 0
open access   publishers   publishing   scholarly communication   

Render time: 0.2659 sec, 0.0339 of that for queries.