Main Menu
Welcome

PLoS ONE will depart from this format considerably. Like a YouTube for scientific primary literature, it will publish all research and use comments, rankings, downloads and other "community tools" to assess scientific quality and importance. Papers published there will still be "peer-reviewed" meaning that experts checked it for serious flaws, but "subjective" editorial rejections are not supposed to occur any more. A recent PLoS Biology article details the vision behind the new portal: ONE for All: The Next Step for PLoS
Personally, I think a portal like this should replace all scientific journals completely. While such a radical departure from traditional scientific publishing will probably not happen any time soon, the time-consuming and often nerve-wrecking poker game of "which journal do I submit my work to?" has to eventually end and make room for a rational publication strategy that benefits everyone. Did I mention I submitted what I consider one of my most important projects so far to PLoS ONE?

Posted on Friday 17 November 2006 - 14:27:18 comment: 0
{TAGS}
{TAGS}
Render time: 0.1101 sec, 0.0066 of that for queries.